Recent International Anti-Dumping Analysis Of Chinese Textiles

< p > < strong > Peru continues to take anti-dumping measures against China's printed a href= "//www.sjfzxm.com/news/" > textile > /a > /strong > /p >

< p > recently, the Chinese Embassy in Peru received the resolution and final report on anti-dumping investigations initiated by Peru on 3 kinds of blended fabrics in China.

< /p >

< p > Peru state competition and intellectual property protection bureau announced that the investigation was closed, and finally decided to maintain anti-dumping measures against Chinese printed fabric products for 2 years, and the tax rate remained unchanged.

At the same time, no anti-dumping duty is imposed on synthetic fabrics and colorful spinning fabrics.

< /p >

< p > it is understood that the 3 products investigated are synthetic fiber fabrics (tax code 5515.12.00.00), colorful spinning fabrics (tax number 5513.31.00.00) and printed fabrics (tax number 5513.41.00.00).

According to the resolution, in 2009, the bureau decided to impose anti-dumping duties on the above products for 3 years. After the expiration of the anti-dumping duty on 2012, the bureau decided to start the sunset review in March of that year because of the application by the enterprises involved in Peru and the industrial association of that country.

< /p >

< p > < strong > Columbia has decided to continue anti-dumping duties on China's < a href= "//www.sjfzxm.com/news/index_c.asp > socks > /a > /strong > /p >

< p > recently, the foreign trade division of the Ministry of trade, industry and tourism of Columbia issued Resolution No. 0019 to make anti-dumping sunset review final results for socks originating in China, and decided to continue to levy anti-dumping duties for a period of 3 years. The anti-dumping duty should be 0.79 dollars / double for the lowest price. If the FOB price is lower than the minimum price, the difference will be charged as anti-dumping duty.

< /p >

< p > the original case was filed on July 4, 2006, and the customs codes of the products investigated were: 61151010, 61153010, 61151090, 61153090, 61159500, 61159600 and 61159900.

The final price is $0.79 / double.

< /p >

The P sunset review was put on record in April 24, 2012. In 2009~2012, the total export volume of products to China was 6 million 25 thousand US dollars, 5 million 952 thousand US dollars and 4 million 886 thousand US dollars respectively, showing a declining trend year by year.

It is reported that due to the small amount involved in the case, there is no enterprise to participate in the lawsuit.

< /p > < p > > strong > the United States made anti-dumping administrative review on the production of polyester a href= "//www.sjfzxm.com" > short fiber < /a > /strong > /p > P > March 6, 2013. The US Department of Commerce issued a notice that the initial anti dumping administrative review of the polyester staple made in Mainland China ruled that the general tax rate of the enterprises involved in mainland China was 44.30%.

"/p > < p > July 3, 2006, the United States Department of Commerce of the United States conducted anti-dumping investigations on polyester staple in mainland China, and the customs code involved in the cases was 55032000.65 and 55032000.45.

< /p > < p > April 19, 2007, the US Department of Commerce made an anti-dumping decision on the case and ruled that the dumping margin of the enterprises involved in mainland China was a tiny amount to 44.30%.

< /p > < p > July 31, 2012, the US Department of Commerce conducted fifth administrative review of the case.

< /p >